Uniform Civil Code (UCC) in India – What It Means and How It Affects You 2025
- Chirag SEHRAWAT
- Nov 27
- 6 min read

Uniform Civil Code (UCC) is one of the most debated legal topics in India today. After 75+ years of independence, we still don't have it – but things are changing.
Uttarakhand became the first state to implement UCC in 2024. Let's understand what UCC is and how it affects every Indian.
What is Uniform Civil Code?
UCC means one common set of civil laws for all citizens of India, irrespective of their religion.
Currently: Different communities follow different personal laws for:
Marriage
Divorce
Inheritance/succession
Adoption
Maintenance
With UCC: Same law for all citizens, regardless of religion.
Constitutional Provision:
Article 44 (Directive Principles): "The State shall endeavor to secure for the citizens a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India."
Note: It's a directive principle, not fundamental right – meaning not legally enforceable, just a goal.
Current Personal Law System:
Hindu Law: (Applies to Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs)
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956
Muslim Law:
Based on Shariat (Islamic law)
Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937
No codified law like Hindus
Christian Law:
Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872
Indian Divorce Act, 1869
Indian Succession Act, 1925
Parsi Law:
Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936
Indian Succession Act (for Parsis)
Special Marriage Act, 1954:
Inter-religious marriages
For those who want civil marriage (not religious)
Goa – Exception: Goa has UCC since Portuguese rule (1867)!Same civil law for all religions.
Why UCC is Proposed:
Arguments in Favor:
✅ Equality: All citizens equal before law (Article 14)✅ Gender justice: Remove discrimination against women in personal laws✅ National integration: One law unites nation✅ Simplification: Easier legal system✅ Secularism: Religion and state separated✅ Modern society: 21st century needs modern laws
Arguments Against:
❌ Religious freedom: Article 25 gives right to practice religion❌ Diversity: India's strength is diversity, not uniformity❌ Cultural identity: Personal laws are part of religious identity❌ Minority fears: Muslims fear Hindu-majority decisions❌ Implementation challenges: Difficult to create acceptable law❌ Political misuse: Can be used to polarize communities
Major Differences in Current Personal Laws:
1. Marriage:
Hindu: Monogamy (one wife only)Muslim: Polygamy allowed (up to 4 wives) for menChristian: MonogamyUCC: Would likely enforce monogamy for all
2. Divorce:
Hindu: Mutual consent divorce, fault-based divorce (cruelty, adultery, etc.)Muslim: Talaq (husband can divorce by saying "talaq" thrice) – Reformed by Supreme Court in 2017 (instant triple talaq banned)Christian: More difficult, fault-based mainlyUCC: Uniform divorce procedures for all
3. Inheritance:
Hindu: Equal share for sons and daughters (after 2005 amendment)Muslim: Son gets double of daughter's shareChristian: More or less equalUCC: Equal inheritance for all genders
4. Adoption:
Hindu: Detailed adoption laws existMuslim: No formal adoption (only guardianship under Kafala)Christian: Governed by Guardians and Wards ActUCC: Uniform adoption rules for all
5. Maintenance:
Hindu: Wife entitled to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC + Hindu Adoption and Maintenance ActMuslim: Different rules, mehr (dower) systemChristian: Under Divorce ActUCC: Uniform maintenance rules
Uttarakhand's UCC (2024) – First State:
Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code Act, 2024 implemented from [date].
Key features:
1. Uniform Marriage:
Compulsory registration of all marriages
Minimum age: 21 for men, 18 for women
Ban on child marriage
Ban on polygamy for all
2. Uniform Divorce:
Same grounds for divorce for all
Mutual consent divorce
Maintenance rules standardized
3. Uniform Succession:
Equal inheritance for sons and daughters
No gender discrimination
4. Live-in Relationships:
Must register
Partners get some rights
Children from live-in get legitimacy
5. Adoption:
All can adopt regardless of religion
Uniform procedure
Who's exempt: Scheduled Tribes (to protect their customs)
Criticism:
Some say it's Hindu law disguised as UCC
Muslims feel targeted
Live-in registration seen as intrusive
Other States Considering UCC:
Gujarat: Drafting UCC
Assam: Committee formed
Madhya Pradesh: Under consideration
Himachal Pradesh: Studying Uttarakhand model
Central Government: Exploring nationwide UCC through Law Commission
Supreme Court's View:
Supreme Court has repeatedly said:
UCC desirable for national integration
Government should implement
But implementation is government's call
Notable judgments:
Shah Bano case (1985): SC said UCC needed
Sarla Mudgal case (1995): SC repeated need for UCC
John Vallamattom case (2003): Questioned discriminatory laws
But SC can't implement – only legislature can.
Gender Justice Angle:
Current discrimination against women:
Muslim Law:
Son inherits double
Triple talaq (now banned)
Polygamy allowed
Limited maintenance
Hindu Law (earlier):
Daughters had no property rights (changed in 2005)
Widow remarriage issues
Christian Law:
Divorce difficult
UCC can bring:
Equal inheritance
Equal divorce rights
Ban on polygamy
Better maintenance
Protection of women's rights
Muslim Community's Concerns:
Fear:
Losing religious identity
Majority imposing rules
Shariat law being discarded
Political agenda against Muslims
Response from UCC supporters:
UCC about civil law, not religious practice
Can still practice religion (prayer, fasting, etc.)
Already follow common criminal law, why not civil?
Several Muslim countries have reformed personal laws
Example: Tunisia, Turkey, Egypt have modern family laws despite being Muslim-majority.
International Comparison:
Countries with UCC:
USA
France
UK
Most Western countries
Pakistan (despite Islamic country, has more uniform laws than India!)
Why India doesn't have? Historical: British didn't interfere in personal laws to avoid religious conflicts.
Goa's Experience:
Goa has UCC since Portuguese rule:
Same law for all religions
Equal inheritance for sons/daughters
Monogamy for all
No problems – Working smoothly for decades
Proves UCC is implementable!
Implementation Challenges:
❌ Political will: Sensitive issue, parties fear losing votes❌ Consensus: Hard to get all communities to agree❌ Diversity: What's acceptable to all?❌ Constitutional: Balancing Article 25 (religious freedom) and Article 44 (UCC)❌ Drafting: Creating law satisfactory to 1.4 billion people❌ Enforcement: Ensuring compliance
Possible Middle Path:
Option 1: Optional UCC
Citizens can choose: Personal law OR UCC
Like Special Marriage Act currently
Option 2: Gradual implementation
Start with less controversial areas
Build consensus slowly
Option 3: Reformed personal laws
Remove discriminatory provisions
Keep rest of personal laws
Option 4: State-by-state
Let states implement (like Uttarakhand)
Learn from experiences
Common Myths About UCC:
Myth 1: "UCC will ban religious practices"Truth: UCC is about civil matters (marriage, inheritance), not religious practices (prayer, fasting, pilgrimage)
Myth 2: "Only targets Muslims"Truth: Applies to all religions equally
Myth 3: "Against secularism"Truth: True secularism means equal law for all, not different laws for different religions
Myth 4: "Hindu law will be imposed"Truth: UCC would be new law created through consultation, not existing Hindu law
Myth 5: "Unnecessary, current system works"Truth: Current system has several discriminatory provisions, especially against women
What UCC Means for You:
If Hindu:
Minor changes (already largely uniform)
May affect inheritance if unequal treatment in family
If Muslim:
Significant changes (polygamy banned, equal inheritance)
Divorce procedures changed
Religious practices unaffected
If Christian:
Divorce easier under UCC
Inheritance rules may change
If from other religion:
Standardized procedures
Clarity in law
For Women (all religions):
Better rights
Equal inheritance
Protection from discrimination
Easier divorce
Better maintenance
For Same-sex couples:
Possibility of civil unions/marriage (though not yet clear)
Current Debate (2024-25):
BJP/NDA: Strongly support UCC, want implementation
Congress/Opposition: Some support in principle, but question timing and method
Muslim groups: Largely opposed, see it as attack on identity
Women's groups: Mostly supportive, want gender-just UCC
Legal experts: Mixed views – some say overdue, others say premature
Public opinion: Divided along religious and political lines
What Experts Say:
Law Commission (2018): "UCC desirable but not necessary at this stage. Focus on reforming personal laws first."
Many legal scholars: "Start with areas of consensus (like marriage registration, equal inheritance), expand gradually."
Way Forward:
Most practical approach:
Wide consultation with all communities
Draft model UCC based on best practices
Gender justice as priority
Respect diversity where possible
Pilot in willing states (like Uttarakhand)
Learn and improve
Build consensus before nationwide implementation
Timeline:
1947: Constitution-makers put UCC as directive principle
1985: Shah Bano case reignites debate
2016: SC asks government about progress
2024: Uttarakhand implements
2025: Law Commission reviewing again
Future: Nationwide UCC possible in 5-10 years?
Conclusion:
UCC is complex issue balancing:
Religious freedom vs equality
Diversity vs uniformity
Tradition vs modernity
Minority rights vs majority rule
Most agree on goal – equality and justice. Debate is about how to achieve it.
Whether UCC happens or not, one thing is clear: Women's rights and gender justice must be protected in any system – personal laws or uniform code.
The conversation continues. Stay informed, participate in debate respectfully, and remember – law should serve justice for all!
What's your view on UCC? Share respectfully in comments!



Comments